![]() The cloud concept is broken, major corps are moving away from it, back to domestic servers. The document did not create itself, focussing on the doc is an error.įocus on the author, who created the doc. I did not allow it in the old days (shared doc on an internal file server) and I definitely do not allow it nowadays (Google Docs “internal” cloud file server etc). The whole notion of a shared document sucks dead bears. As a matter of (a) a visible delivery, as well as (b) a matter of pride, I don’t want anyone writing on them. in the middle of a project, containing far less content than the final), which are subject to ongoing changes, are mine mine mine. I have the dubious luxury that I am a consultant, not really part of a team, even though I may head a customer team for the duration of a project. ![]() there would be issues re lines joined to objects shadows etc. And I do not see how it can be done within the current limits of OG and PP. The question still remains is there in any way you could take a OG flowchart and move it into PP so you can manipulate the flowchart at it’s individual elements? I am not suggesting that it is a great presentation tool, or that it is equivalent to PP/Keynote. If the presentation needs to be given in increments, or you need to “move separate objects around”, use OG. ![]() I am saying, use the right tool for the job. You may be stuck in Maslow’s Law of the Instrument. I think we are losing sight of the question and talking theory/usability (The typewriter is definitely better for some tasks, and the computer definitely better for other tasks.) I don’t understand what you mean in your computer::typewriter analogy. It’s like saying why use a computer (OG) when you have a typewriter (PP for flowchart)?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |